A bomb blast, people dead, a lot of grieving souls, and a bunch of joyous dimwits who engineered these explosions. This sequence of events is no stranger to people across the world, and the world is informed by a bunch of trigger and bomb happy morons with great pride that these acts have been committed in the Name of God. What an irony, I say.
If these people knew what God stood for, we won’t be mourning the loss on innocent lives. And on that point I introspect as to why is my God so different from their? For one, isn’t God supposed to be one not matter what name we call him?
But if these murderers, yes that is what they are to me, were clever enough to understand this simple fact that no God will ever be happy if people are massacred in her/his name, then we won’t be writing such posts, would we?
To me these people are just plain losers who are non-believers in God and are resorting to killing indiscriminately in the name of God to vent their frustration at not being able to fulfill their material desires. The logic is if I am not capable enough, or if I haven’t had the opportunity to go on and accumulate what I want, then the rest of the world should also not be allowed to do the same. And what better way to go about doing it than killing people in the name of God.
I know that most of you will rationalize that the guys who are indulging in such acts are poverty-stricken youths who have been misguided by a few cunning for their personal gains. I agree. But by that logic all of us have many desires that remain unfulfilled in a lifetime. So does that mean that all of us should go about blowing up people and places and then lay the blame on God’s doorstep?
I also agree with the argument that most of these killers are recruited at a very young age and are taught by force to believe in a reality that is totally different from reality. But does that absolve them of the crimes against humanity? No. And if these guys at 18 and 20 have been raised in an ideology of blood and death, then they cease to be humans and lose the right to freely move around civil society or whatever is left of it.
Last, all top politicians and intelligence agencies across the world know what they are up against and who the perpetrators of these crimes are. But unfortunately they chose to play politics over dead bodies. Instead of finding a permanent cure for this virus, they keep finding temporary patches. The permanent cure is to eliminate the source of such radical thinking. If the source is gone, then the thought will die its natural death.
I know that it is easy to write but difficult to execute. But can’t we put aside petty politics and at least make a beginning in the Name of God and show these people what God stands for? If the answer is No, then what can I say other than let us all be bombed to glory until kingdom comes.
Monday, July 28, 2008
Wednesday, July 9, 2008
Politics OR Politricks
Below is the profile of a Politician who ran the country aground. Readers, can you see anything so out of the ordinary in the man’s profile that qualifies him to hold a country to ransom and push it toward economic ruin. More so, does the profile qualify this person to be an expert on nuclear technology? For someone with a non-descript profile, it’s quite an achievement that this person has managed to bring down a government that is partly elected by the people. I say partly because the lead party never had a two-thirds majority. I guess that is what we call democracy where anyone can piss on the hopes of over 1 billion people and be self-righteous about it on camera.
PROFILE
A communist politician in India
College educated; thank God for that!
Involved with student politics. Spotted and noticed by a leading Left Politician. Worked with many more communist politicians
Heads a publishing house and has written a few books.
Married to a comrade.
PROFILE
A communist politician in India
College educated; thank God for that!
Involved with student politics. Spotted and noticed by a leading Left Politician. Worked with many more communist politicians
Heads a publishing house and has written a few books.
Married to a comrade.
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Are We All Racist At Heart?
The world is all in black and white. And according to me, brown, yellow and any other possible color too. I am not talking about environment here; I am talking about race; Racism to be precise, of color, religion and all possible denominations.
I was reading an article in the New York Times about the US presidential elections that delved in detail about the color of Barack Obama’s skin and his Muslim middle name, all the while emphasizing that he was Christian. Apparently, the article claims that people in the Arab world and Muslim states are excited that Obama may become the next US president. And all the excitement because Obama’s middle name is Husein.
As I thought of the article, a pattern started forming in my mind about various articles written by the global media, the actions of people and reactions of politicians and governments to the same. A pattern of separation by race, by color, religion, by social status.
I guess we, human beings, like to think of ourselves not only as better than the rest but as better than one other too. If we map conversations, we will realize that there is so much need to differentiate. America has color, while we have religion, caste, geography, etc., etc., etc.
The key question then is, how right is one country OR a set of people in terming others racist. In my opinion, most of us are racist at heart. There will be a few, who do not differentiate, but then they are evolved souls and if all people across the whole world were so evolved, we would be living in Paradise, won’t we?.
I have so often heard people in India or Indians living in the US, or elsewhere in the world, refer to Africans as kallus, the Orientals as chinks, the whites as goras, and Pakistanis as bloody Pakis to cite a few. And I am sure people from other countries will have their terms to depict people from different parts of the world.
If all this is not being racist, then what is. In India, we call people from the south as Madrasis, from UP and Bihar as Bhayyas, so on and so forth…the list is endless. And we still get offended when people from other parts of the world call us racist; this trend applies to people across countries.
As a reader your question would be, where am I going with this line of thought? To them I say nowhere. I am just trying to understand all the brouhaha over the term Racism when 99% of the world’s human beings are racist at heart. Therefore, do we take offense to being labeled a racist because we believe the allegation is unjust and a lie, or is it because it is the universal truth that 99% of us are closet racists and we feel offended and go on the defensive because we are living a lie?
It’s for you to look into your hearts and find the answer. And believe me, 9 of 10 times the answer that comes from our heart may jolt our conscience.
I was reading an article in the New York Times about the US presidential elections that delved in detail about the color of Barack Obama’s skin and his Muslim middle name, all the while emphasizing that he was Christian. Apparently, the article claims that people in the Arab world and Muslim states are excited that Obama may become the next US president. And all the excitement because Obama’s middle name is Husein.
As I thought of the article, a pattern started forming in my mind about various articles written by the global media, the actions of people and reactions of politicians and governments to the same. A pattern of separation by race, by color, religion, by social status.
I guess we, human beings, like to think of ourselves not only as better than the rest but as better than one other too. If we map conversations, we will realize that there is so much need to differentiate. America has color, while we have religion, caste, geography, etc., etc., etc.
The key question then is, how right is one country OR a set of people in terming others racist. In my opinion, most of us are racist at heart. There will be a few, who do not differentiate, but then they are evolved souls and if all people across the whole world were so evolved, we would be living in Paradise, won’t we?.
I have so often heard people in India or Indians living in the US, or elsewhere in the world, refer to Africans as kallus, the Orientals as chinks, the whites as goras, and Pakistanis as bloody Pakis to cite a few. And I am sure people from other countries will have their terms to depict people from different parts of the world.
If all this is not being racist, then what is. In India, we call people from the south as Madrasis, from UP and Bihar as Bhayyas, so on and so forth…the list is endless. And we still get offended when people from other parts of the world call us racist; this trend applies to people across countries.
As a reader your question would be, where am I going with this line of thought? To them I say nowhere. I am just trying to understand all the brouhaha over the term Racism when 99% of the world’s human beings are racist at heart. Therefore, do we take offense to being labeled a racist because we believe the allegation is unjust and a lie, or is it because it is the universal truth that 99% of us are closet racists and we feel offended and go on the defensive because we are living a lie?
It’s for you to look into your hearts and find the answer. And believe me, 9 of 10 times the answer that comes from our heart may jolt our conscience.
Thursday, June 5, 2008
Laughing Gas
These days Gas is king. And for now I am not talking about the byproduct of an inefficient digestive system. The government did not want to but had to hike prices of petrol, diesel, and LPG. The Opposition knows the government had no choice but will protest the hike. Businessmen do not want to harm the poor, but will have to for self-preservation takes precedence over Nation. So where does it leave the common man? In a Gas chamber, I guess.
That was the serious part of the story. But there is no point in worrying about it now, is there? For there is very little that people like you and me can do about politics, largely a preserve of the demented mind. The only time we come into play is once in five years, when he the humble politician barges into our building, knocks on our door surrounded by 8 to 10 ruffian looking men, and demands our vote. It is our franchise, but their right, you see!
So I resort to humor in trying to find ways of how we can solve our Gas, as Oil is called in America, problem. This may sound crude to most, but one way is to recruit people with ample gas reserves (read ability to pass wind at will) and use them to fill our LPG cylinders. We can call it HPG, or Human Personalized Gas. Anyways when gas burns, it rarely stinks. These cylinders can also serve as stink bombs that we can throw at politicians to tell them how much they stink. But I am not sure if it will work, for pigs thrive in slush, don’t they?
Maybe housing societies in Metros can erect sheds in their compounds and rear cattle. This will be dual purpose: a) daily supply of milk, b) Gobar (cow dung) gas. Maybe we can even collect cattle urine in a big covered pit. Over time, it will emanate fumes similar to public toilets in Mumbai. We can use those fumes to fire our burners in the kitchen.
A city like Mumbai must be generating huge amounts of human waste on a daily basis. The city already has the Dadar Malpravah Prakriya Kendra (Dadar Waste Recycling Center) where human waste is converted into potable drinking water. And that water is supposed to be cleaner than that which runs through our taps. Water aside, maybe we can look at ways to convert the huge amount of human waste into gas, and add a dash of perfume, if needed.
Here the migrant population could be of great help; opponents of migrants to city, this is mainly for your consumption—the information, not the gas. Mumbai has at least 7 million people living in slums or on sidewalks. I can see a huge opportunity here. We can build a few more Malpravah Prakriya Kendras for harnessing their bowel movements to our advantage. I can taste water and smell gas already. And the migrants can be paid to defecate in customized toilets. It will be win-win situation for everyone. We will get gas and water, the migrants will get money to crap—I think that would be a first in the world—and we can walk on streets and sidewalks without the fear of cutting cakes daily.
If I apply my mind to it, I can come up with many more such ideas, but I guess there is a limit to how much crap readers can digest. So I end with the thought that if I cannot change the world, at least I can laugh it off. Laughter is the best medicine, isn’t that what we have been told since time immemorial?
That was the serious part of the story. But there is no point in worrying about it now, is there? For there is very little that people like you and me can do about politics, largely a preserve of the demented mind. The only time we come into play is once in five years, when he the humble politician barges into our building, knocks on our door surrounded by 8 to 10 ruffian looking men, and demands our vote. It is our franchise, but their right, you see!
So I resort to humor in trying to find ways of how we can solve our Gas, as Oil is called in America, problem. This may sound crude to most, but one way is to recruit people with ample gas reserves (read ability to pass wind at will) and use them to fill our LPG cylinders. We can call it HPG, or Human Personalized Gas. Anyways when gas burns, it rarely stinks. These cylinders can also serve as stink bombs that we can throw at politicians to tell them how much they stink. But I am not sure if it will work, for pigs thrive in slush, don’t they?
Maybe housing societies in Metros can erect sheds in their compounds and rear cattle. This will be dual purpose: a) daily supply of milk, b) Gobar (cow dung) gas. Maybe we can even collect cattle urine in a big covered pit. Over time, it will emanate fumes similar to public toilets in Mumbai. We can use those fumes to fire our burners in the kitchen.
A city like Mumbai must be generating huge amounts of human waste on a daily basis. The city already has the Dadar Malpravah Prakriya Kendra (Dadar Waste Recycling Center) where human waste is converted into potable drinking water. And that water is supposed to be cleaner than that which runs through our taps. Water aside, maybe we can look at ways to convert the huge amount of human waste into gas, and add a dash of perfume, if needed.
Here the migrant population could be of great help; opponents of migrants to city, this is mainly for your consumption—the information, not the gas. Mumbai has at least 7 million people living in slums or on sidewalks. I can see a huge opportunity here. We can build a few more Malpravah Prakriya Kendras for harnessing their bowel movements to our advantage. I can taste water and smell gas already. And the migrants can be paid to defecate in customized toilets. It will be win-win situation for everyone. We will get gas and water, the migrants will get money to crap—I think that would be a first in the world—and we can walk on streets and sidewalks without the fear of cutting cakes daily.
If I apply my mind to it, I can come up with many more such ideas, but I guess there is a limit to how much crap readers can digest. So I end with the thought that if I cannot change the world, at least I can laugh it off. Laughter is the best medicine, isn’t that what we have been told since time immemorial?
Friday, May 30, 2008
‘Bush’whacked
A rich rogue nation can flaunt the will of a disparate majority. New York Times columnist David Brooks uses these words to describe the Bush government’s aggressive views on Iran. I reread the article to figure out if the columnist were talking about Iran or the US. After my second read, I realized that it indeed was Iran.
The columnist talks of how the Iranian government does not know what it is doing because there are four factions at work there. The logic being how can the US understand what the Iranians are up to when the Iranians themselves do not know what they are up to.
Then the talk veers to how the Iranians have armed the Hezbollah in Lebanon against the wishes of the UN, how they repeatedly flouted international rules by going ahead its nuclear program, and how China, India, Russia are by cooperating with the Iranians are making it difficult for the Americans to make the Iranians see their point of view.
Ah! I said to myself, that is the crux of the problem. While I was reading the article I was mentally replacing Iran with the US and found that for a country that has repeatedly ignored international voices in the name of national security, they sure are behaving like whining bullies.
Let us look at the US’s history since 1945. That was the year they dropped Atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan citing the need to do so to humble an expansionist Japan. By dropping those bombs, the US became the first country to explode Atomic bombs in the world and to this day remains the only country to have done so.
Then came the Cold War era when in the name of national security, the US indulged in an arms race with the erstwhile USSR, stockpiling nuclear bombs and arms, which America continues to own to this day. But it is again a case of one rule for the King and another for the commons.
When India under the Vajpayee government conducted a Nuclear test, the US went around the world screaming murder. I think the Americans forgot that India as a country has never attacked anyone in the world, while the Americans have a history of engaging in wars (e.g., Vietnam/Afghanistan/Iraq) on fictitious grounds of national security. I guess America has a right to worry about national security but others do not.
Since America decided that Communism was bad, they unilaterally decided that it was bad for the rest of the world too. Since America feels Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is a menace, it wants the whole world to concur. Since America feels that Iran is a potential threat, it wants the whole world to think so too. Since America thinks that China and India are the reason for the spike in food prices, the rest of the world has to agree. In short, the world has to see through American eyes, or opt to be blind.
I am no supporter of Iran, nor do I believe that Communism is the best thing to have happened to the world. At the same time, I do believe that for America, America has been and continues to be its single-biggest enemy.
The foolhardiness of American politicians in propagating the either you are with us or you are against us theory has caused the American people and the world at large the most grief. And American politicians, even after 60-odd years of following this policy and achieving little in terms of peace and more in terms of war, continue to walk the same path.
That forces me to think that Americans should, before pointing fingers at the Iranians and everyone else in the world, look inward. If they do so, they will realize that their problems are a result of years of their government not knowing what it is doing, but continuing to do so with foolish conviction, rather than the rest of the world knowing not what they are doing.
The columnist talks of how the Iranian government does not know what it is doing because there are four factions at work there. The logic being how can the US understand what the Iranians are up to when the Iranians themselves do not know what they are up to.
Then the talk veers to how the Iranians have armed the Hezbollah in Lebanon against the wishes of the UN, how they repeatedly flouted international rules by going ahead its nuclear program, and how China, India, Russia are by cooperating with the Iranians are making it difficult for the Americans to make the Iranians see their point of view.
Ah! I said to myself, that is the crux of the problem. While I was reading the article I was mentally replacing Iran with the US and found that for a country that has repeatedly ignored international voices in the name of national security, they sure are behaving like whining bullies.
Let us look at the US’s history since 1945. That was the year they dropped Atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan citing the need to do so to humble an expansionist Japan. By dropping those bombs, the US became the first country to explode Atomic bombs in the world and to this day remains the only country to have done so.
Then came the Cold War era when in the name of national security, the US indulged in an arms race with the erstwhile USSR, stockpiling nuclear bombs and arms, which America continues to own to this day. But it is again a case of one rule for the King and another for the commons.
When India under the Vajpayee government conducted a Nuclear test, the US went around the world screaming murder. I think the Americans forgot that India as a country has never attacked anyone in the world, while the Americans have a history of engaging in wars (e.g., Vietnam/Afghanistan/Iraq) on fictitious grounds of national security. I guess America has a right to worry about national security but others do not.
Since America decided that Communism was bad, they unilaterally decided that it was bad for the rest of the world too. Since America feels Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is a menace, it wants the whole world to concur. Since America feels that Iran is a potential threat, it wants the whole world to think so too. Since America thinks that China and India are the reason for the spike in food prices, the rest of the world has to agree. In short, the world has to see through American eyes, or opt to be blind.
I am no supporter of Iran, nor do I believe that Communism is the best thing to have happened to the world. At the same time, I do believe that for America, America has been and continues to be its single-biggest enemy.
The foolhardiness of American politicians in propagating the either you are with us or you are against us theory has caused the American people and the world at large the most grief. And American politicians, even after 60-odd years of following this policy and achieving little in terms of peace and more in terms of war, continue to walk the same path.
That forces me to think that Americans should, before pointing fingers at the Iranians and everyone else in the world, look inward. If they do so, they will realize that their problems are a result of years of their government not knowing what it is doing, but continuing to do so with foolish conviction, rather than the rest of the world knowing not what they are doing.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Want To Save India? Divide & Rule
Is India as one country in its present form a good idea? The answer is NO. Before you jump to conclusions, I am not advocating disintegration of the country. What I am proposing is India as a country with the Central government responsible for defense and foreign policy. The states will function as independent units within a larger country with their own governments setting growth plans and targets minus the Central government’s interference.
I know that most people will dismiss me as crazy, and I do not blame them for that. For the average Indian, the very idea would sound preposterous. I understand them, for all our failings we still manage to put national interest first when the country is under any external threat. Unfortunately, most Indians do not feel the need to react as one to counter external entities threatening the country internally by proxy. By that, I mean leveraging discontent within to foment trouble from the outside.
Given the size of our country, the hundreds of languages and thousands of dialects that we speak, it is no mean task to protect ourselves as one large entity, especially given the prevalent corruption. And anyways we are constantly fighting against one another for land, water, air and many such issues: a) Maharashtra is fighting the entry of outsiders; b) Maharashtra and Karnataka are fighting over who should own Belgaum; c) Chennai and Karnataka are fighting over the Cauvery waters and now the Hogenekkal Dam; d) UP and Bihar think that they are a different country and a law unto themselves; e) the North-East does not consider itself a part of India—Central neglect is the culprit here; f) Jammu and Kashmir wants to be a separate country. I can go on and on about the widespread discontent across the country.
When I look at all that is happening across the country, I find it extremely difficult to be proud of being an Indian. The question is what is there to be so proud about other than a perverse sense of jingoistic nationalism?
If we want to save India as a country, I believe that the time has come to let states be independent but part of a larger federation. The logic is that when states are independent, and are not dependent on the Center for financial aid, then they will be completely accountable for their actions and, hence, stop indulging in counterproductive activities; states will be forced to cooperate with each other to survive as island nations. When there is no Center to blame, then automatically local politicians will start seeing their bluff being called more often.
Another benefit of this exercise would be the end of regional parties with a handful of votes having a say in National politics. The reason: only national parties will have the right to fight Lok Sabha elections. Then we will have a government with a clear-cut majority that will not dillydally on issues of National Security as seen in the UPA coalition’s handling of the Nuclear deal.
This formula will also solve most problems caused by unbridled migration to regions that are more prosperous from regions that have failed to keep pace. With visas/permits required to work in a state other than that of birth, it will then be in the hands of individual state governments to decide whom to let into the workforce and whom to keep out. What this will do is force governments of states low down the development chain to pull up their socks, get their house in order and give development the much-needed impetus. When that happens, jobs will be created across the country, automatically eliminating the need for people to venture out of their states in search of a livelihood. I will not be surprised if the very states that oppose migration today try wooing the qualified labor force in other states.
Anyways the Indian Premier League (IPL) has shown us how parochial in mentality we Indians can be. If you ask me, the IPL has come at the right time, showing us the mirror. Even after seeing ourselves in this mirror, if we continue to live in a Fools Paradise, then generations that follow us will end up paying a heavy price—the price of disintegration. Our neighbors are working towards and waiting for the country to disintegrate. It is now for us to decide whether we want to stay ahead of the game, or grant them their wish.
I know that most people will dismiss me as crazy, and I do not blame them for that. For the average Indian, the very idea would sound preposterous. I understand them, for all our failings we still manage to put national interest first when the country is under any external threat. Unfortunately, most Indians do not feel the need to react as one to counter external entities threatening the country internally by proxy. By that, I mean leveraging discontent within to foment trouble from the outside.
Given the size of our country, the hundreds of languages and thousands of dialects that we speak, it is no mean task to protect ourselves as one large entity, especially given the prevalent corruption. And anyways we are constantly fighting against one another for land, water, air and many such issues: a) Maharashtra is fighting the entry of outsiders; b) Maharashtra and Karnataka are fighting over who should own Belgaum; c) Chennai and Karnataka are fighting over the Cauvery waters and now the Hogenekkal Dam; d) UP and Bihar think that they are a different country and a law unto themselves; e) the North-East does not consider itself a part of India—Central neglect is the culprit here; f) Jammu and Kashmir wants to be a separate country. I can go on and on about the widespread discontent across the country.
When I look at all that is happening across the country, I find it extremely difficult to be proud of being an Indian. The question is what is there to be so proud about other than a perverse sense of jingoistic nationalism?
If we want to save India as a country, I believe that the time has come to let states be independent but part of a larger federation. The logic is that when states are independent, and are not dependent on the Center for financial aid, then they will be completely accountable for their actions and, hence, stop indulging in counterproductive activities; states will be forced to cooperate with each other to survive as island nations. When there is no Center to blame, then automatically local politicians will start seeing their bluff being called more often.
Another benefit of this exercise would be the end of regional parties with a handful of votes having a say in National politics. The reason: only national parties will have the right to fight Lok Sabha elections. Then we will have a government with a clear-cut majority that will not dillydally on issues of National Security as seen in the UPA coalition’s handling of the Nuclear deal.
This formula will also solve most problems caused by unbridled migration to regions that are more prosperous from regions that have failed to keep pace. With visas/permits required to work in a state other than that of birth, it will then be in the hands of individual state governments to decide whom to let into the workforce and whom to keep out. What this will do is force governments of states low down the development chain to pull up their socks, get their house in order and give development the much-needed impetus. When that happens, jobs will be created across the country, automatically eliminating the need for people to venture out of their states in search of a livelihood. I will not be surprised if the very states that oppose migration today try wooing the qualified labor force in other states.
Anyways the Indian Premier League (IPL) has shown us how parochial in mentality we Indians can be. If you ask me, the IPL has come at the right time, showing us the mirror. Even after seeing ourselves in this mirror, if we continue to live in a Fools Paradise, then generations that follow us will end up paying a heavy price—the price of disintegration. Our neighbors are working towards and waiting for the country to disintegrate. It is now for us to decide whether we want to stay ahead of the game, or grant them their wish.
Monday, May 26, 2008
Coalition—Frankenstein Personified
The biggest and ugliest of monsters unleashed by politicians and political parties in India is the politics of coalition. Coalition, according to me, is a mechanism using which politicians subvert peoples mandate to usurp power. And all in the name of saving state and country from disintegration.
Coalition politics is the single-most corrupt political practice prevailing in the world today, more so in India. I guess only Italians can claim to be more experienced in this art of governance of convenience; now we know why the Congress is leading the way. I know that politicians will immediately cite the Constitution and the Law of the land, stating that such politics is legally permissible.
It is legal is something that all of us know and we as a nation are suffering because of this legality is also something that all of us know. Sadly, I do not know if any of us citizens of this democratic country can do anything to put this coalition genie back into the bottle other than voting any one party to power.
That again is like asking for a miracle in a country where politicians and religious leaders have managed to fracture the thought processes of people to a level of great minuteness that in the 21st century when science and technology have made giant advances, we are busy dividing the nation on the basis of caste, religion, and geography.
Thanks to coalition politics, we now have hundreds of thousands of parties in the country who manage to secure a few seats each and then enter the political ring for their pound of flesh. So what we now have are governments in power that are rendered impotent by selfish individuals following different ideologies driven purely by personal greed.
Cases in point are the UPA government at the center and its predecessor the NDA. If we are to look at the working of the UPA government over the past four years, it is evident that nine of the 10 decisions taken have been motivated by the pressures of coalition and/or appeasing vote banks or whatever is left of them post all the fragmentation. That dear friends, is a sad reflection of what our political class has come to be over our 60-plus years of independence.
I know that people will cite the list of achievements since independence. To them I say, that we have managed to achieve so much in spite of political impotency is more of a tribute to the resilience and enterprise of our people than the result of government planning and political will.
Any country where a hand full of MPs elected from just two of our 28 states and 7 union territories manage to derail the plans of a government by holding it to ransom, claiming that they represent the thought process of the entire nation, is testimony of the failure of coalition politics.
I can understand people coming together to do good for the country, to take the country forward. But when political parties start coming together with the sole aim of keeping their rivals in the Opposition, then I believe that the country’s political process has failed and politicians have wronged the very voters who entrusted them with the task of nation building.
Finally, when these same political parties lose elections, they start saying things like our opponents misled the voters, which is akin to rubbing salt on the raw wounds of the electorate. The reason: politicians are directly calling voters i.e., you and me Idiots. Subverting the mandate and then calling the very people who gave that mandate Idiots can only happen in a great democracy like India.
In times like these, I am left wondering if we still are a Democracy or have we mutated into Coalicracy, an ugly breeding of Democracy and Coalition politics. I think the time has come for voters to realize the futility of giving fractured mandates. If we cannot think on those lines, then at least we need to find a way of preventing politicians from entering marriages of convenience where getting a divorce does not even require the mandatory period of separation.
Coalition politics is the single-most corrupt political practice prevailing in the world today, more so in India. I guess only Italians can claim to be more experienced in this art of governance of convenience; now we know why the Congress is leading the way. I know that politicians will immediately cite the Constitution and the Law of the land, stating that such politics is legally permissible.
It is legal is something that all of us know and we as a nation are suffering because of this legality is also something that all of us know. Sadly, I do not know if any of us citizens of this democratic country can do anything to put this coalition genie back into the bottle other than voting any one party to power.
That again is like asking for a miracle in a country where politicians and religious leaders have managed to fracture the thought processes of people to a level of great minuteness that in the 21st century when science and technology have made giant advances, we are busy dividing the nation on the basis of caste, religion, and geography.
Thanks to coalition politics, we now have hundreds of thousands of parties in the country who manage to secure a few seats each and then enter the political ring for their pound of flesh. So what we now have are governments in power that are rendered impotent by selfish individuals following different ideologies driven purely by personal greed.
Cases in point are the UPA government at the center and its predecessor the NDA. If we are to look at the working of the UPA government over the past four years, it is evident that nine of the 10 decisions taken have been motivated by the pressures of coalition and/or appeasing vote banks or whatever is left of them post all the fragmentation. That dear friends, is a sad reflection of what our political class has come to be over our 60-plus years of independence.
I know that people will cite the list of achievements since independence. To them I say, that we have managed to achieve so much in spite of political impotency is more of a tribute to the resilience and enterprise of our people than the result of government planning and political will.
Any country where a hand full of MPs elected from just two of our 28 states and 7 union territories manage to derail the plans of a government by holding it to ransom, claiming that they represent the thought process of the entire nation, is testimony of the failure of coalition politics.
I can understand people coming together to do good for the country, to take the country forward. But when political parties start coming together with the sole aim of keeping their rivals in the Opposition, then I believe that the country’s political process has failed and politicians have wronged the very voters who entrusted them with the task of nation building.
Finally, when these same political parties lose elections, they start saying things like our opponents misled the voters, which is akin to rubbing salt on the raw wounds of the electorate. The reason: politicians are directly calling voters i.e., you and me Idiots. Subverting the mandate and then calling the very people who gave that mandate Idiots can only happen in a great democracy like India.
In times like these, I am left wondering if we still are a Democracy or have we mutated into Coalicracy, an ugly breeding of Democracy and Coalition politics. I think the time has come for voters to realize the futility of giving fractured mandates. If we cannot think on those lines, then at least we need to find a way of preventing politicians from entering marriages of convenience where getting a divorce does not even require the mandatory period of separation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)